The timing of Lieberman's death is awfully convenient for the Deep State
The sudden passing of the public face of the "No-Labels" movement as the bitter 2024 campaign heats up should ignite suspicions
Count this author as no fan of the late former Senator Joe Lieberman. For those who may not remember, he played a very prominent role in the early 2000s in assisting the likes of John McCain and Lindsay Graham in getting America mired into the utterly worthless conflicts in Southwest and Central Asia. Many of the ills which plague America today came about thanks to his efforts to bring about those reckless, foreign interventions.
However, one thing you did have to admire about the man was the fact that he did successfully chart his own path between the two sides of the Uniparty, despite anger from the leadership of both sides as he did so. The best example of this was in 2006 when his own Democratic party refused to re-nominate him for the US Senate. Undaunted by that setback, he formed his own “Connecticut for Lieberman” party, giving him a vehicle through which he could still seek re-election. Effectively gaming different factions of the Uniparty, picking up endorsements and support from members of both sides, he built up a sufficient base of support which helped him win election to what would be his fourth and final term.
Fast forward to the 2024 election season, and though Lieberman had been out of government for over a decade, he was again playing a prominent role irking the Uniparty. As one of the leaders of the “No-Labels” movement, Lieberman was trying to help create on a national scale what he had done in 2006 in Connecticut. He and the team at “No-Labels” were seeking to put together a presidential ticket straddling the two sections of the Uniparty and rejecting what they considered the “extremes” of Donald Trump and Joe Biden.
Unlike 2006 however, there is no appetite on the part of the Deep State actors within the Uniparty to even humor the idea of non-Uniparty candidates being presented as options to the American voter. They have made this abundantly clear in the extensive demonization and lawfare campaigns they have launched against candidates outside the Uniparty with significant name recognition, such as Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Cornel West, the Green Party and, of course, No-Labels. While the Uniparty has always sought to suppress candidates they felt would be annoying to their electoral arrangements, their fear of such candidates is significantly heightened this time because they fear losing complete control of their lesser faction to Trump and the damage that could do to their power structure. It therefore becomes imperative, in order to preserve their power, to restrict the race to two candidates and make their candidate the preferred choice to the “wanna-be dictator” Trump. This, in their mind, would then make the electoral manipulation of the results in their favor (which is undoubtedly happening) easier to cover up in the realm of public relations in the aftermath of November 5th.
Lieberman’s successful background and experience in building coalitions, and mounting challenges without the Uniparty leadership’s approval, made “No-Labels” a very serious threat to the Uniparty’s 2024 electoral plans. While RFK Jr is the threat which has gotten the most publicity thanks to his famous family name, behind the scenes it was undoubtedly Lieberman and “No-Labels” who were viewed as the greatest threat, at least in the eyes of the Uniparty. The ominous threat issued by Uniparty advocates in December 2023 “If you have one fingernail clipping of a skeleton in your closet, we will find it… We are going to come at you with every gun we can possibly find” was undoubtedly aimed primarily at candidates with name recognition who might consider “No-Labels.” The likes of RFK Jr, Cornel West and others have already been the subject of massive campaigns of demonization and mud-slinging, meaning such threats would not mean much to them. However, more prominent politicians would have far more to lose and would be far more vulnerable to such prying into their background. The warnings by former congressman Madison Cawthorn and the Uniparty’s apoplectic response to his comments as well as the sudden revelations and demonization campaign which drove former New York governor Andrew Cuomo from office speak to this reality. The fact that days after the Uniparty advocates made that threat, “No-Labels” sent a letter to the DOJ complaining about this intimidation which was followed a few days later by a personal letter from Lieberman to his former Senate colleague Biden asking him to stop this harassment shows that “No-Labels” was well aware they were being treated as the greatest threat to the Uniparty’s electoral arrangements.
The Uniparty’s efforts have undoubtedly had an effect as evidenced by the long list of political figures who have rejected the outreach from “No-Labels.” However the movement had pressed on undaunted. In mid-March 2024, Lieberman put forward a confident prediction that a presidential ticket would be named and that the Uniparty’s continuing attacks on “No-Labels” was an effort to distract from their own failings with Joe Biden. It seemed as if Lieberman’s leadership would see “No-Labels” through the tough attack stage through to the actual campaigning stage, which Lieberman admitted he was very much looking forward to.
Then two weeks later the news broke that Lieberman had died. The news sent shockwaves throughout the larger American political realm who had just been becoming re-acquainted with him thanks to his “No-Labels” advocacy. A brief explanation slowly emerged that not long after his mid-March statements about “No-Labels” he had suffered a fall and his death had been a result of complications from that fall. While complications from falls are not uncommon causes of death for elderly Americans like Lieberman (he was 82), the timing of his death, tied in with the cause of death, is enough to raise an eyebrow of suspicion. When one factors in the detrimental effect the loss of Lieberman might have on the “No-Labels” movement going forward, suspicions can only grow.
Was Lieberman’s death at this particular time really all an unfortunate accident and a coincidence? Maybe. However the information as just laid out raises some serious questions, especially in the aftermath of the revelations brought about by Wikileaks, Snowden, Russiagate, the Twitter Files, and the 2020 and 2022 election shenanigans just to name a few. In the end we will probably never know for sure, however where there is smoke there is fire and the sudden confluence of all these coincidences creates an awful lot of smoke. Furthermore, with the times we are now living in, we are confronted with the same reality Commissioner Jim Gordon laid forth to newly promoted detective John Blake in Christopher Nolan’s film The Dark Knight Rises: “You’re not allowed to believe in coincidence any more.”
Sources:
https://keepgovlocal.locals.com/post/5210989/secession-speakeasy-55-marc-elias-trump-influencers-join-to-stop-electoral-secession
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/former-us-senator-joe-lieberman-dies-82-media-reports-2024-03-27/
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/joseph-lieberman-man-of-the-inside-party/
https://www.racket.news/p/is-the-electoral-fix-already-in
https://www.racket.news/p/the-anti-democratic-movement-targeted
https://www.nolabels.org/documents/59546/DOJ%20letter%201.11.24.pdf
https://www.nolabels.org/documents/59543/Sen%20Lieberman%20Letter%20to%20Pres%20Biden.pdf
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4533053-no-labels-leader-says-candidates-could-be-announced-this-month/
https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/joe-lieberman-no-labels-donald-trump/2024/03/15/id/1157409/
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/lieberman-no-labels/2024/03/27/id/1158890/
https://nationalfile.com/madison-cawthorn-discusses-disturbing-orgy-and-cocaine-scene-in-washington/
https://nationalfile.com/kevin-mccarthy-tries-to-silence-madison-cawthorn-for-discussing-political-cocaine-orgy-scene/
https://nationalfile.com/breaking-new-york-gov-cuomo-resigns-after-new-york-ag-says-hes-guilty-of-groping-kissing-hugging-employees/